Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

CUSTOMS AND EXCISE

Excise Tax Act

GKO Engineering v. Canada

A-384-00

2001 FCA 123, Rothstein J.A.

24/4/01

2 pp.

Appeal from Tax Court Judge's decision dismissing application for judicial review application on basis GST rebate application made by wrong person--Appeal dismissed--No basis for Court to interfere with factual finding rebate application made by applicant and not by person that remitted GST in question--While applicant argued entitled to claim rebate as successor to business of person that had remitted GST, no evidence alleged entitlement to rebate inherited by applicant--Reliance on Excise Tax Act, s. 272.1 misplaced as provision dealing with things done by person as member of partnership--Here, rebate application filed by partnership rather than by person who, prior to formation of partnership, remitted GST with respect to which rebate sought--Not case of honest mistake such as clerical error but rather change of intention after realization application made by wrong person--Excise Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. E-15, s. 272.1 (as enacted by S.C. 1997, c. 10, ss. 76, 232).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.