Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Gahungu v. Canada ( Minister of Citizenship and Immigration )

IMM-284-94

Muldoon J.

6/1/95

5 pp.

Motion to strike out two paragraphs, three exhibits of applicant's affidavit on ground applicant seeking to rely on grounds not before Refugee Division when made decision -- Affidavit referring to letters created after Refugee Division's hearing (September 1993), but before decision rendered (January 1994), and to articles published after decision rendered -- Leave to take judicial review proceedings specifically permitting further affidavits to be filed, served -- Ordinarily matter in litigation completely past event and that which goes before Court on judicial review only that which was before board, tribunal -- But refugee claims prospective in that claimant at risk of return to country as dangerous, or more so, than when departed -- Countries producing genuine refugee claimants often extremely volatile in regard to social conditions, persecution of minorities -- Further affidavits in support of each side permitted after Court granting leave because refugee claims based on past and prospective possible events -- Such dispensation not suggested in ordinary judicial review of IRB's decisions -- Introduction of genuinely relevant material within time between Refugee Division hearing and judicial review hearing in matter continuously prospective in nature should be permitted on judicial review.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.