Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Status in Canada

Permanent Residents

Gakar v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

IMM-5851-99

Teitelbaum J.

18/5/00

14 pp.

Judicial review of visa officer's refusal of application for permanent residence--Applicant requested consideration under occupations of Management Consultant, Financial Controller--Applicant earned Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1985, Master of Arts degree in 1988, Master of Commerce degree in 1990, Master of Business Administration in 1992--Visa officer not satisfied applicant engaged in full-time studies for first degree--Directed applicant to provide proof bachelor studies full-time--Gave applicant 30 days in which to furnish proof--Nine days before deadline applicant faxing letter to visa officer indicating unable to gather necessary documents within 30-day period, requesting additional 30 days to comply with requirements--Visa officer refused extension--Applicant submitting documentation approximately 12 days after deadline--Application allowed--Decision not to extend 30-day delay to allow applicant to furnish proof of full-time student status breach of duty of fairness--Application for permanent residence submitted in Hong Kong, but university studies from 1982 to 1985 in New Delhi, India--Conceivable, not unreasonable, would take more than 30 days in which to gather information, proof requested--As applicant attempting to comply with visa officer's direction, versus attempting to delay, frustrate process, visa officer ought to have extended deadline--Visa officer must be flexible, understanding when interviewing applicant--Visa officer giving no valid reason for refusal of extension--Refusal not understandable when first such request, having no adverse effect on respondent, particularly when respondent, in setting up interview took extra two months from that originally promised--Additionally, visa officer, when giving applicant 30 days to get required document, spoke of bachelor of arts degree when applicant never claimed to have such degree--Matter returned for new hearing before different visa officer.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.