Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Elguindy v. M.N.R.

T-1900-93

Reed J.

29/9/93

4 pp.

Appeal from Associate Senior Prothonotary's decision striking out statement of claim for lack of jurisdiction -- On July 19 plaintiff requesting Minister to make decision under Customs Act, s. 131 -- Letter stating if no response within 10 days, would assume Minister upholding seizing officer's decision -- S. 135 providing person requesting decision under s. 131 may appeal within 90 days after being notified of decision -- When no reply received plaintiff filed statement of claim challenging "deemed decision" -- Defendant filing motion to strike or alternatively leave to file conditional appearance to contest Court's jurisdiction -- Leave to file conditional appearance not relevant proceeding -- In order to seek first relief defendant must have already voluntarily appeared and attorned to Court's jurisdiction -- Decision to strike based on R. 419(1)(a), not R. 401 -- Under s. 135 some positive act of notification by Minister required before litigation commenced -- Statement of claim not disclosing reasonable cause of action -- Appeals are from orders, not reasons -- Prothonotary's order not incorrect -- Federal Court Rules, C.R.C., c. 663, RR. 401, 419 -- Customs Act, R.S.C., 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 1, ss. 131, 135.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.