Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

VOL. XV.] EXCHEQUER COURT REPORTS. 31 BRITISH COLUMBIA ADMIRALTY DISTRICT. NOSLER v. THE SHIP AURORA. 1913 Nov. 19. ShippingAdmiralty LawPracticeAction in remWagesJudgment in default of appearanceWaiver of proceedings. In an action in rem for seaman's wages wherein no appearance has been entered; and the ship is in the marshal's hands for sale in another cause, all preliminary proceedings may be waived and judgment entered forthwith. MOTION before the Honourable Mr. Justice Martin, Local Judge of the British Columbia Admiralty District, at Vancouver on November 12th, 1913, in an action in rem for seaman's wages for judgment in default of appearance. The plaintiff filed his affidavit verifying the cause of action and showing that no appearance had been entered though two weeks had elapsed since the . filing of the warrant, and also that the ship was now in the Marshal's hands for sale in another action in this court. Hefurther deposed "that ' " before I . commenced this action I was advised by " the owner of the Aurora to come up town and " see if I could not get my wages out of the' ship." The plaintiff's solicitor filed . an affidavit stating that " I am informed by (A.B.) solicitor for the owner of " the ship. Aurora that it is not intended to dispute " the plaintiff's claim:" J. E. Sears, on behalf of the plaintiff, cited Rule 115; Howell's Adm. Prac.(1); The Julina (2), and asked for an order for immediate judgment. (1) Pp. 54, 55. .. (2) (1876) 35 L.T.N.S. 410. ,
32 EXCHEQUER COURT REPORTS. [_VOL. XV. 1913 MARTIN, Lo. J. yIn the special circumstances of NOBLER v. this case wherein the debt is practically admitted THE SHIP . AURORA. and the ship now in process. of sale by the Marshal, I see no reason why an order should not be made waiving Reasons for Judgment. all preliminary proceedings and directing judgment to be entered forthwith. This case is stronger, if anything, than the Julina (1) . Order accordingly. (1) (1876) 35 L.T.N.S. 410.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.